The
idea of jihad as the struggle to be a better Muslim is considered by
many to be the "greater jihad." This jihad is an inner fight, not an
outer one. The prophet Muhammad is reported to state:
The best jihad is [by] the one who strives against his own self for Allah, The Mighty and Majestic.
This inward, spiritual jihad has
Muslims struggling to forsake sin, control their anger, and generally
improve their adherence to the directives of the prophet Muhammad. Some
scholars believe that Muslims must undertake this inner, spiritual jihad
before they can address their responsibility to conduct an outer,
physical jihad.
The
minor jihad is the armed struggle. However, that does not automatically
mean unjustified use of violence. The minor jihad may be divided into
two: aggression and defense. Aggression against any people is not
permitted in Islam; however, defense is an absolute right of every
individual and nation.
Islam has allowed the minor jihad only to defend the Muslim people and their land, and to maintain peace in Muslim societies.
Islam
teaches that Muslims should be strong in order to defend themselves,
but that does not mean they have to become aggressive and unjust. In
Chapter 8, Surah al-Anfal, verses 60-61 of the Qur’an, God has provided
this general guidance very clearly when He addresses Muslims in the
following way:
“Prepare
against them (i.e., the enemy) with whatever force and trained horses
you can in order to frighten thereby Allah’s enemy, your enemy, and
others besides them who you do not know but Allah knows them.” (Surah
al-Anfal, 8:60)
After giving this general guidance of being strong and prepared to defend ourselves, the verse goes on:
“But if they (the enemies) incline to peace, then you (also) incline to it, and put your trust in Allah…” (Surah al-Anfal, 8:61)
In
short, Islam wants Muslims to be strong so that others would not bully
them; but then they have to extend the hand of peace even towards their
enemies if there is an inclination of peace on the enemy’s part.
Peace
and freedom are two essential requirements of a society. Just as
various penal measures help in protecting a society from the evils and
excesses committed by an individual, resorting to armed offensives
sometimes becomes essential to curb the evils perpetrated by countries
and nations. As long as diplomatic relations and negotiations can be
used to resolve matters, no one would endorse the use of force for
settling affairs. However, if a nation threatens to disrupt the peace
and freedom of the world and its arrogance and haughtiness exceed all
bounds, a stage may come when the use of force and power becomes
essential to keep it in check. In such cases, it is the inalienable
right of humankind to forcibly stop its subversive activities until
peace and freedom of the world are restored
The Arabic term jihad literally means “striving.” Jihad is often mistranslated as “holy war.” While the word can refer to military action against an aggressor, this is by no means the only meaning of the term. Traditionally, Muslim sources distinguish between the “greater” and the “lesser” jihad. The “greater jihad” is described by Muslim scholars as an internal struggle to avoid negative actions and cultivate good character. The “lesser jihad” is the external striving for justice, in self-defense or against oppression. One can do this in one’s heart, with one’s tongue or pen, and, if these are ineffective, by forcibly trying to change an oppressive situation, as, for instance, the colonists waged the Revolutionary War against the oppressive policies of the British, or as the Allies in World War II went to war against the aggression of Hitler. It should be noted, however, that violent revolution was often seen by classical scholars as the absolute last resort. The social chaos and mayhem that could ensue from overthrowing an oppressive leader was often viewed as much worse than the reign of an oppressor.
While there are differing views among Muslims on their interpretation of Qur’anic verses about war, as about other subjects, the majority of Muslim scholars today interpret the Qur’an to allow war only for self-defense, as delineated in the following verse: “Fight in the cause of God against those who fight you, but do not transgress limits by aggressing; surely God does not love transgressors” (Qur’an, 2:190).
The Qur’an describes the desirability of peace and the means of attaining it in various passages, including the verse, “If they incline toward peace, then seek you peace also,” which clearly demonstrates that peace is a desired state to be striven for. Another verse describes the blessings of peace: “’Peace,’ a word from a Merciful Lord” (Qur’an, 36: 58). Furthermore, Salaam alaikum – “peace be upon you” – is the universal Islamic greeting; and as-Salaam is one of the 99 names of God, meaning “The Giver of Peace.” One of the best-known prophetic supplications is: “O God, You are peace, peace comes from You. Blessed are You O Possessor of Glory and Honor.” Furthermore, one of the various names for heaven is Dar al-Salam, “Abode of Peace.”
Like other holy books, including the Bible, there are a number of verses about warfare in the Qur’an; they address the struggle of the early Muslims against the Meccans who fought and persecuted them first in Mecca and then after they established a state in Medina, where Muslims fought back for the first time. However, they make up a small percentage of the 6,000 verses of the Qur’an. In addition, it is important to keep in mind the following:
The Arabic term jihad literally means “striving.” Jihad is often mistranslated as “holy war.” While the word can refer to military action against an aggressor, this is by no means the only meaning of the term. Traditionally, Muslim sources distinguish between the “greater” and the “lesser” jihad. The “greater jihad” is described by Muslim scholars as an internal struggle to avoid negative actions and cultivate good character. The “lesser jihad” is the external striving for justice, in self-defense or against oppression. One can do this in one’s heart, with one’s tongue or pen, and, if these are ineffective, by forcibly trying to change an oppressive situation, as, for instance, the colonists waged the Revolutionary War against the oppressive policies of the British, or as the Allies in World War II went to war against the aggression of Hitler. It should be noted, however, that violent revolution was often seen by classical scholars as the absolute last resort. The social chaos and mayhem that could ensue from overthrowing an oppressive leader was often viewed as much worse than the reign of an oppressor.
While there are differing views among Muslims on their interpretation of Qur’anic verses about war, as about other subjects, the majority of Muslim scholars today interpret the Qur’an to allow war only for self-defense, as delineated in the following verse: “Fight in the cause of God against those who fight you, but do not transgress limits by aggressing; surely God does not love transgressors” (Qur’an, 2:190).
The
other justification for war in the Qur’an is to protect others from
harm, but this is permissible only if the harm prevented is greater than
the harm caused by the acts of war. This is the same as the principle
of proportionality in the Christian doctrine of just war, which bears
other similarities to the concept of war in the Qur’an.
According
to the following Qur’anic verses, protecting others from harm includes
defending people of other faiths: “To those against whom war is made,
permission is given to fight, because they are oppressed. Verily, God is
capable of aiding them. They are those who have been expelled from
their homes in defiance of what is just, for no other reason than that
they say, ‘Our Lord is God.’ Had God not restrained one set of people by
means of another, monasteries, churches, synagogues, temples and
mosques wherein God’s name is oft-mentioned would have been destroyed.
God will certainly aid those who aid His cause” (Qur’an, 22:39-40).The Qur’an describes the desirability of peace and the means of attaining it in various passages, including the verse, “If they incline toward peace, then seek you peace also,” which clearly demonstrates that peace is a desired state to be striven for. Another verse describes the blessings of peace: “’Peace,’ a word from a Merciful Lord” (Qur’an, 36: 58). Furthermore, Salaam alaikum – “peace be upon you” – is the universal Islamic greeting; and as-Salaam is one of the 99 names of God, meaning “The Giver of Peace.” One of the best-known prophetic supplications is: “O God, You are peace, peace comes from You. Blessed are You O Possessor of Glory and Honor.” Furthermore, one of the various names for heaven is Dar al-Salam, “Abode of Peace.”
Like other holy books, including the Bible, there are a number of verses about warfare in the Qur’an; they address the struggle of the early Muslims against the Meccans who fought and persecuted them first in Mecca and then after they established a state in Medina, where Muslims fought back for the first time. However, they make up a small percentage of the 6,000 verses of the Qur’an. In addition, it is important to keep in mind the following:
- A reading of the “warlike” verses in their context in the Qur’an invariably shows that they refer to situations in which the Muslim community was under attack, either through direct military aggression or forcible denial of legitimate rights of freedom of religion and expression—that is, they refer to, and permit, only strictly defensive warfare. Aggression is clearly prohibited (Qur’an, 2:190).
- The earliest verse related to fighting (22:39) states that “permission [to fight back] is given to those who have been wronged,” clearly indicating that such permission is an exceptional allowance responding to a specific situation, and that peaceful conduct is assumed to be the norm for Muslims.
- There are strict rules of warfare outlined by the Prophet Muhammad and his successors that prohibit targeting civilians, specifically women and children, or even harming infrastructure or crops used by civilians.
Hiç yorum yok:
Yorum Gönder